On 05.01.2009, at 12:31, Antony Blakey wrote:
How about relying on documentation?This view may be slow (or not, for a small db). I might use it for testing or ad-hoc maintenance. Who knows? The one thing you can say for certain is that it is temporary, unlike every other view. That is the defining characteristic of this facility, and hence _temp_view is the appropriate name.
Agreed. So, um, can we get this change backed out? Cheers, -- Christopher Lenz cmlenz at gmx.de http://www.cmlenz.net/
