On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6 Jan 2009, at 12:54, Noah Slater wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>> >>> There is no mechanism in CouchDB that people should use "instead of MVCC" >>> whereas in most cases people shouldn't use _temp_views at all and we make >>> the >>> case that we don't really need them at all. Why should we keep them >>> (other >>> than "because we have them")? >> >> Being able to easily play/debug with views is presumably a net win. > > Via Futon, Chris will prepare a patch that keeps the current behaviour. > Other libraries exist (CouchRest), are in the process of being updated > (couchdb-python) and can easily be written. > > Cheers > Jan > -- >
How will automatic deletion of these "temporary" will be handled ? I don't see how you could do differently than the current mecanism ? - benoît
