On 12 Jan 2009, at 00:30, Sunny Hirai wrote:

I know I can put the 'name' in the '_id' field but I'd like to avoid it because I'm abstracting CouchDB and the abstraction does not allow for it.

Why is that?


Anybody have any solutions other than making 'name' the '_id' field?

You'd need some service that acts as global state outside of CouchDB
that ensures it only allows one client to take a certain name.  CouchDB
won't do that for you.

Cheers
Jan
--

Reply via email to