On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Sunny Hirai <[email protected]> wrote: > Ara.T.Howard and Antony Blakey: > > Thanks for the feedback. > > Hmm, this idea is interesting assuming that CouchDB will enforce the > uniqueness per database (see earlier post I made).
CouchDB will enforce unique docids within a database on a single node. In the long run, we may also support partitioning a single database across many nodes. In that case, we should also support uniqueness constraints with a single logical database. So should your name server get too busy for one box, Couch should support spreading the load across a cluster of boxes. > > I think I will consider this. > > In-ter-esting. > > Sunny > -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
