Again, maybe premature optimization, but the indexer could run a JS
function over the doc and treat the result like a view result. Yes,
this is duplicating a bit of the work that views do, but it saves
storing one copy of the data.
Cheers
Jan
--
On 18.01.2009, at 20:31, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
The reason that I don't try and index the entire DB is because of the
arbitrary structure to JSON. Indexing a value that isn't a string
leads to a whole lot of questions with no good answers. By indexing a
view I let people pick exactly which parts of their db they want
indexed.
If some can dream up a structured indexing that doesn't suck, I'd be
glad to take a look. But after all the playing I've done with it I
just don't really see the structured stuff as being useful.
HTH,
Paul Davis
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
Yeah, but in case I just want to index the entire DB I don't want to
have another index with a copy of all my data.
Cheers
Jan
--
On 18 Jan 2009, at 19:29, Justin Cormack wrote:
You can just make a view with everything in if you want to index the
entire
DB.
Indexing views is much more flexible.
Justin
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]>
wrote:
One thing I noticed (which is different from my original
implementation)
that you do not index databases but only views, is that correct?
I'm not
sure if it matters, but I do see the case for "meh just index the
entire
database". Is this a planned feature?
Cheers
Jan
--
Thanks,
Paul Davis
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Paul Davis
<[email protected]> wrote:
Darrin,
action2 went away because _external is now in trunk. My couchdb-
lucene
branch is still there and I've put it on the schedule to bring
into
conformance with the very slightly altered trunk version (trunk
includes more info in the line API).
Moving forward you can pull a copy of the couchdb-lucene stuff
and
hack on it to get it working or wait for me to get to it this
weekend.
HTH,
Paul Davis
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Darrin Wortlehock
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
In late November I was working with davisp's couchdb-lucene,
which
required
jchris' action2 branch to work.
I am now returning to the development I was doing, building a
new
development environment from scratch and it appears that jchris'
action2
branch has now gone away.
I am specifically interested in lucene integration. Can anybody
provide
any
hints on how to move forward?
Regards,
Darrin
