On 9 Feb 2009, at 16:55, Adam Petty wrote:
-- as for an example db issue...
For some reason - without transactions the RDBMS people at my work
seem to
not want to consider couch for anything having to do with money.
Somebody should tell them that banks have since moved
to eventually consistent data storage for most but the most
heavyweight (money-)transactions.
Cheers
Jan
--
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Noah Slater <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 04:18:09PM +0100, Wout Mertens wrote:
To be honest, I think saying RDBMS and CouchDB are for different
solutions is just you guys being nice. I think that any application
would benefit from using the CouchDB model and only in very
specific,
very demanding cases an RDBMS would be better. I can't think of any
examples though.
Not really, I just like avoiding the flames. Heh heh.
I see where you want to go with this, and I agree that some
applications
are
better suited to CouchDB, but I think it's often a blurry line, and
you
will
draw fire from the RDBMS people for anything too concrete.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
