On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ben Hood <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Chris Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: >> There are 2 reasons you can't use this in an application. One is that >> you're better off assuming your application can't control compaction. >> The second is that you have to think this way if you'll be dealing >> with replicated data. If you have edits on dbB and you replicate them >> to dbA, dbA only see the edits that dbB would still contain if it were >> replicated.
In my hurry I mistyped this. The last word should be "compacted". Makes the whole thing make sense. ;) -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
