On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Antony Blakey <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 09/03/2009, at 11:14 AM, Chris Anderson wrote: > >> If one were to use couch_btree and mochiweb to make a JSON store that >> is very Couch-like but doesn't pass the CouchDB tests or replicate >> with CouchDB nodes, I'd consider it to be a different product, and I >> think it would be misleading to call it CouchDB. > > This accords with our thinking. What would you say if it were purely a > matter of the bulk-op semantics? >
If it looks like CouchDB to other CouchDB nodes, and applications written for CouchDB can run on it just fine, then it's pretty close. The problem I see in your case is that applications written for the Couchy thing might not run on CouchDB. -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
