On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Bradford Winfrey <[email protected]> wrote: > Just thinking aloud here, but storing each widget (if as Dean asked there are > in fact "lots" of them) would be much better suited to be stored in its own > document, should a widget change, you'd save a significant amount of space > (since couch will keep a full copy of each revision until compaction) rather > than saving the whole collection of them each time. >
Taking this approach would probably require that you store the full path(s) to the widget on the widget document itself. This isn't so bad but does complicate changing only a parent node say, halfway up the tree, as you have to touch all it's subnodes. -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
