On 7 May 2009, at 21:40, Parnell Springmeyer wrote:
I am also in the process (have been for a while) of building an Erlang
backed triplestore. Not a light undertaking by anymeans and I may be
using
CouchDB to build that ontop of it (license permitting).
License* permits :)
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Cheers
Jan
--
CouchDB + RDF = FTW
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Demetrius Nunes <[email protected]
>wrote:
Hi there,
We are evaluating new technologies for managing semi-structured
data and
documents in one of our applications. We've got tired of wrestling
relational databases for this.
I would like to know why would I prefer to use CouchDB instead of a
RDF
database, such as Sesame ou Mulgara.
I know some of the RDF advantages, such as open standards,
interoperability,
rules engines, semantic queries, community and tool support,
maturity, etc.
But I really like the simplicity of the CouchDB model.
Can anyone enlighten me?
Thanks a lot,
Demetrius
--
____________________________
http://www.demetriusnunes.com
