Hi,

You've probably realized by now that couchdb views and couchdb-lucene
indexes are completely separate. It is not currently possible to use
couchdb-lucene on the output of a couch view.

B.

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Wolfgang
issovits<wolfgang.issov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, your tip worked just fine. I was just a little bit confused by
> indexing and views and _design documents.... It's all so different with this
> document based database but I will figure it out ;)
>
> kind regards,
> Wolfgang
>
>
> Manolo Padron Martinez wrote:
>>
>> Hi:
>>
>> As I know
>>
>> http://localhost:5984/databasename/_fti/lucene/by_name/?q=docname:something
>>
>> Regards from Canary Islands
>>
>> Manuel Padrón Martínez
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Wolfgang
>> issovits<wolfgang.issov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I've tried to set up couchdb with lucene for a while with no success so
>>> far.
>>> I created a "_design/lucene" document for indexing which looks like this:
>>>
>>> {
>>>  "_id": "_design/lucene",
>>>  "_rev": "5-2604847086",
>>>  "fulltext": {
>>>      "by_name": {
>>>          "defaults": {
>>>              "store": "yes"
>>>          },
>>>          "index": "function(doc) { var ret=new Document();
>>> ret.add(doc.name); return ret }"
>>>      }
>>>  }
>>> }
>>>
>>> In addition I created a "_design/views" document:
>>>
>>> {
>>>  "_id": "_design/views",
>>>  "_rev": "20-662305778",
>>>  "language": "javascript",
>>>  "views": {
>>>      "all_signals": {
>>>          "map": "function(doc) {\n  if (doc.type == 'signal')\n
>>> emit(doc.name, doc._id);\n}"
>>>      }
>>>  }
>>> }
>>>
>>> Now i tried to call this view with a query. I tried several different
>>> urls
>>> with no success so far. All I get are different errors... ("Extra path
>>> info
>>> in request", "test/luence/all_signals is not a valid view", "No view name
>>> in
>>> path")
>>>
>>> Can someone tell me the right way to call a view with a query parameter?
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> kind regards,
>>> Wolfgang
>>>
>
>

Reply via email to