Well, there is a problem with this. I don't like the idea of recording the whole path in each transaction, because it is anticipated that accounts are able to change places in the tree. So my TRANSACTION only holds information for only the "actual" account it's issued against, not for its whole lineage.
On the other hand, ACCOUNTS do have the information for THEIR path(lineage), exactly as you suggested. So the problem now is making the connection between an account and its balance :) > > query your reduce view with group_level=1 (or 2 or 3 .. depending on how > many level you want to descend into your tree). Your "path" to the root node > should be an array as in: ["toplevel", "firstlevel", "secondlevel"] as the > key of your view. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > >
