On 25 Sep 2009, at 07:51, go canal wrote:
thanks for confirming, I think it is acceptable, though not ideal.
Just wondering, since we can modify individual field with Futon, why
don't we expose the API ? rgds,
The only thing that is not ideal about this is transport cost and
memory usage between the client and CouchDB. This issue came up a few
times and we asked that the reporter go and build a working system and
then show a real-world benchmark (heh) that indicates that this
particular behaviour of CouchDB is a bottleneck. Until then, this is
premature optimization that should be avoided.
Cheers
Jan
--
canal
________________________________
From: Jesse Hallett <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 9:54:10 AM
Subject: Re: is there a way to pass a request parameter to a view ?
Sorry, you have to upload the whole doc. You do not have to send
attachments again though.
On Sep 24, 2009 6:14 PM, "go canal" <[email protected]> wrote:
thanks !
Can I use this bulk update to change a field without uploading the
full doc:
{
"docs": [
{"_id": "1", "_rev": "1-2089673485", "integer": 2},
{"_id": "2", "_rev": "1-2063452834", "integer": 3, "string": "3"}
]
}
So for doc _id 1, I only change 'integer'; will the rest be kept
intact, or
CouchDB will actually create a new doc with 'integer' only ?
rgds,
canal
________________________________
From: Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:02:30 PM
Subject: Re: is there a way to pass a request parameter to a view ?
On 24 Sep 2009, at 12:40, Matt Goodall wrote: > 2009/9/24 Jan
Lehnardt <
[email protected]>: >> >> On 2...
