That patch is harder. Patches welcome though :) Paul Davis
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Sebastian Negomireanu <[email protected]> wrote: > How about returning the new document instead? It would make things easier, > since most of the time after a copy operation you want to use the new > document. So instead of making two requests, you can only make one. > > > Best regards, > Sebastian Negomireanu | CTO / Managing Partner JustDesign Sibiu, Romania > +40-726-181186 | +40-788-757462 > [email protected] > > SC JustDesign SRL | Str. Dorului 20, 550352, Sibiu, Romania > +40-269-210008 | [email protected] | www.justdesign.ro > > The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the ones to > which it is addressed, and contains information which is confidential and > may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use (of any part) of > this information is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, > please notify the sender or Just Design SRL by return e-mail or telephone > (+40-269-210008) and delete this e-mail from your system, including any > attachments thereto. Any information in this message that does not relate to > the official business of Just Design SRL shall be understood as neither > given nor endorsed by it. Internet communications are not secure, therefore > Just Design SRL does not accept any liability for either the contents of > this message, or any damage related to documents and/or data which are > communicated by e-mail. Violation of this notice may be unlawful. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Davis [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 9:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: COPY bug > > Hmmm. Now all we have to do is decide if we want ok:true or not. > > Anyone have an opinion? It would remain more consistent with the other > CRUD style operations that don't return a document. > > Paul > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Sebastian Negomireanu > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The documentation I'm looking at is here: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/HTTP_Document_API >> >> You just need to scroll down to the COPY command. The response in the >> documentation is: >> >> HTTP/1.1 201 Created >> Server: CouchDB/0.9.0a730122-incubating (Erlang OTP/R12B) >> Etag: "355068078" >> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:12:49 GMT >> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 >> Content-Length: 41 >> Cache-Control: must-revalidate >> >> {"ok":true,"id":"some_other_doc","rev":"355068078"} >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul Davis [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 7:30 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: COPY bug >> >> Sebastian, >> >> There doesn't appear to be anything in the code to return {ok:true, >> ...} as you mention. Can you paste a link to the docs? It could be >> that we dropped the flag in a refactor. >> >> This is a less than one line patch to fix, does anyone have any >> insight on to what's proper? >> >> Paul Davis >> >> Note to future self: Line 785 in couch_httpd_db.erl >> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Sebastian Negomireanu >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am running the Windows version of CouchDB. It seems that when I perform >> a >>> COPY operation the result does not contain the ok=true pair, only the id >> and >>> rev values. Is this by design or is it a bug (the documentation says that >> it >>> should also return the ok value)? >>> >>> >>> >>> _____ >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Sebastian Negomireanu | CTO / Managing Partner JustDesign Sibiu, Romania >>> +40-726-181186 | +40-788-757462 >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> SC JustDesign SRL | Str. Dorului 20, 550352, Sibiu, Romania >>> +40-269-210008 | <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] | >>> <http://www.justdesign.ro> www.justdesign.ro >>> >>> The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the ones to >>> which it is addressed, and contains information which is confidential and >>> may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use (of any part) >> of >>> this information is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, >>> please notify the sender or Just Design SRL by return e-mail or telephone >>> (+40-269-210008) and delete this e-mail from your system, including any >>> attachments thereto. Any information in this message that does not relate >> to >>> the official business of Just Design SRL shall be understood as neither >>> given nor endorsed by it. Internet communications are not secure, >> therefore >>> Just Design SRL does not accept any liability for either the contents of >>> this message, or any damage related to documents and/or data which are >>> communicated by e-mail. Violation of this notice may be unlawful. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
