On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 21:36, Troy Kruthoff <[email protected]> wrote: > I have an app that gets data from a view and then monitors _changes for > updates. Currently it: > > 1) Gets the update_seq from the database > 2) Gets data from a view > 3) Connects to _changes since updae_seq from #1
I am doing exactly the same in my application and the gap between #1 and #2 also worried me - a special header sounds like a feasible solution and I can't see any downside besides the few bytes of overhead in the header for each request. regards, Joscha
