> 
> I think it's actually good practice to use docids for friendly identifiers. 
> Then collisions between URL slugs will appear as couchdb conflicts 
> (eventually, in the case of distributed app, and immediately, in the case of 
> a single node or partitioned cluster).
> 

At first I thought this, too. But this would mean documents have to be deleted 
and then re added for updates. _ids used to realize a sort of relation have to 
be changed, too - like comments in a blog. So I thought it might be better to 
avoid further problems by not using url friendly identifiers as _ids.

But I see the point: Better error handling. Additionally it might be useful to 
add a prefix to distinguish between content types and being able to have the 
same identifiers for different content types.

Reply via email to