Hi, 2010/1/17 Metin Akat <[email protected]>
> Nicolas, in your particular situation you need full text search. > Nothing less will be satisfactory for you and your users. And in my > opinion setting up couchdb-lucene is easier than writing > "fulltext-like" views for couchdb. Go read the docs here > http://github.com/rnewson/couchdb-lucene/tree/0.4-maint > If you get in trouble, I could try to help you. > I agree that couchdb-lucene would be more efficient. But for one of my project (the tiny CRM app), I was thinking about using CouchDB instead of an existing MS Access DB. As the app is to be run on Windows, I would have liked something really easy to run. The user of this app does not have internet at work, so I would have liked a self contained app instead of having to deploy some java software (jdk+lucene) + ... So for my own app on a server, I'll give a try to couchdb-lucene. For my tiny CRM app, maybe I'll use some pure couchdb code depending on requirements. Thanks for all your replies, Nicolas -- Nicolas Steinmetz http://www.steinmetz.fr - http://nicolas.steinmetz.fr/
