Chris Anderson wrote:
> This is a known consequence of the implementation. You're not the
> first to notice it. The problem is getRow calls an implicit start.
> Not ideal, I know. I'll think on how to fix this cleanly. As always,
> patches welcome.
wouldn't it be enough to send the headers just prior to sending some
content,
e.g.
function send(chunk) {
if(!chunks) sendStart();
...
}
that would allow for calling getRow without sending any headers and
still force validity if the user decides to use send() without calling
start() first. I could write a patch for that...
regards,
Joscha
--
