Also have a look at this thread http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201001.mbox/%[email protected]%3e
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Paul Davis <[email protected]>wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Santi Saez <[email protected]> wrote: > > El 01/02/10 17:56, Paul Davis escribió: > > > > Dear Paul, > > > >> Well, 2^32 of anything is 4GiB per byte stored. So, minimum of four > >> bytes and you're at 16GiB. Even with just 1KiB overhead you're at > >> 4TiB. > >> > >> I'm left wondering why you would want to store a list of numbers in > >> the first place. > > > > Imagine a service like Netcraft. > > > > I know that there aren't 2^32 active servers, but I wanted to test it > with > > 4.3 billion documents and stress/benchamark CouchDB with other DBs. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Santi Saez > > http://woop.es > > > > If you're looking for benchmark data I'd also suggest something like > the Enron email dataset. I can't imagine 4.3 billion integer documents > is going to be very informative about real world usage. The Wikipedia > abstracts data set another candidate as well. > > HTH, > Paul Davis >
