On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Brian Candler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:21:31AM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> i would prefer to have a slower indexation and less CPU used.
>
> nanosleep()?
>

I'm not sure it would solve the stuff. Maybe queuing view indexation.
But i really would like to understand why it has to take so much CPU.

- benoit

Reply via email to