On 16 April 2010 16:22, Fredrik Widlund <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well, we're building a solution on Couch and replication on a relatively > large scale and saying "it just works" doesn't really describe it for us. I > really like the Couch design but it's a bit of a challenge making it work, > for us. I can describe the case if you like. > > Also we already have a decentralized distributed file system layer (which > often is a natural part of a cloud solution I suppose) so if we could run it > on top of that it would lessen the complexity of the overall solution. > > In any case it was a quick comment to the Hadoop question, and maybe it just > wouldn't work that way. You could in general discuss atomic > operations/locking and performance implications by moving synchronization to > a lower abstraction layer I guess. > <snip>
You should look into couchdb-lounge . It should resolve most of your "sharding" replication issues :) -- David Coallier
