On 06/29/2010 06:39 AM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
not sure about fedora, but the displayed version by the js-command is very odd
(read: not correct) on my systems (os x). I would not rely on that information.
This is the same information that yum reports for the package.
js-devel-0.70 and js-0.70. Maybe OSX has a habit of reporting incorrect
versions, but I've not seen any core maintained packages with anything
bit minor rev discrepancies. The spec file says that it is built against
this.
On 29.06.2010, at 15:32, Wendall Cada wrote:
While doing some preliminary research on building a couchdb rpm, I discovered
that Fedora/Centos/RedHat couchdb rpms are built against js-devel-0.70.
As can be seen here:
$ js -v
JavaScript-C 1.7.0 2007-10-03
I am quite shocked that it is being built against something so ancient.
xulrunner-devel is at 1.9.2.4 on my fc13 workstation.
The question is, how much of a performance hit is there using this very old and
outdated js lib?
Wendall
