It is starting to concern me that we're trying to design the site by committee. And design by committee is a terrible way to achieve anything with cohesion. I'm not sure what to do though.
The ideal solution would be for us to appoint a designer/webmaster who's sole responsibility was the design and maintenance of the site. This person could then take guidance from the community on what should be included, and what we'd like on the site - but would be free to call the shots, and ultimately decide how things were going to look. Does anyone have any ideas how we can move towards this, and away from the current situation? Having a bunch of geeks (and we're hardly known for our design prowess in the first place, right?) argue about what should and should not be included will lead us head first into the kind of open source website we all know and hate.
