Hi Chris,
thanks for the feedback. I am well aware of the shortcoming. Two
reasons, mainly:
a) I had the code ready from previous implementation for the RelaxDB
gem.
b) I had not enough time to figure out/translate the abstract
description from the recipe into code. Moreover, will_paginate depends
on the "Jump to Page" functionality [http://mislav.uniqpath.com/page_attachments/0000/0045/will_paginate-digg-style.png
]. As far as I understand it, that's explicitely explained as
impossible with the "correct" solution as presented in recipe?
Karel
On 29.Jul, 2010, at 19:04 , Chris Anderson wrote:
Why not use the linked list style pagination described also in that
recipe? The problem with the skip approach is that the 1000th page
will take a long time to load (and potentially disrupt database
performance for other queries). I'm not sure what advantage the
approach you take gives over the proper solution.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:01 AM, Karel Minařík
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I've recently needed will_paginate [http://github.com/mislav/will_paginate/
] pagination for CouchPotato [http://github.com/langalex/
couch_potato] views.
You can get the WillPaginate adapter from the following Gist:
--> http://gist.github.com/498177
Tests are included in-file. Note that it uses the non-recommended,
"slow" method of pagination as described in the relax book (http://books.couchdb.org/relax/reference/recipes#Pagination
). Feedback is appreciated.
Karel
--
www.karmi.cz
