So far, I get the differences even after compacting twice and three times.
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Sivan Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Sivan Greenberg <[email protected]> >> Date: Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 6:58 PM >> Subject: Questions about database file sizes. >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> Hi List, >> >> First I'd like to say that my longly developed couchdb based system >> seems to be performing well and serving its purpose. >> >> However, there's always a small difference between the database files >> on the 2 couchdb server nodes we are using, after identical compaction >> steps on both db's, the difference remains around 4k, even though the >> number of documents is the same. >> >> This is CouchDB 0.11.0 , 2 nodes, each one does a pull replication >> from its peer in continue replication over HTTP. >> >> Is this normal? Can we sleep at night without fearing the delta would >> at some edge case occasion increase to the gigs ? Is it unrealistic to >> expect the two files to be of the same size given same compaction >> steps were taken and they both replicate pull from each other? >> >> Many thanks, >> (CouchDB Rocks!) >> >> -Sivan >> > > You might try compacting twice. If you're not seeing the difference > change after continuous writes its probably not a big deal. > > Paul >
