On my low-end 32-bit windows box, that I have to use as a production server for the bank I work for, my views are 4 times faster in Erlang.
I've got gigs of data and over 130 views. The engine javascript started to crash regularly and was un acceptably slow when rebuilding the views. I first moved to first to python (2x faster and no crashes) and then to Erlang (4-5x faster and no crashes). The speed is great, the system is in production. I've no regrets and Erlang saved my ass. Thanos On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm using them. Mind you, the main reason is that I far prefer erlang to > javascript :-) > That said, they seem to be a good bit faster (50%?), but I don't really have > much else to add... > > cheers > Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya | CTO | [email protected] | 703.386.1500 Ext. 9100 > 2250 Corporate Park Drive | Suite 150 | Herndon, VA | www.aptela.com > Check out our Blog | Follow us on Twitter | Refer a Friend > > > > On Jan 18, 2011, at 7:20 PM, kowsik wrote: > >> A couple of questions: >> >> 1. Is anyone using erlang views (as opposed to Javascript) in a >> production environment? >> 2. For the map and filter functions, is there any kind of published >> performance numbers that show the speed up? >> >> Yes, I'm aware of the built-in reduce functions and I'm using them >> extensively. I'm more interested in erlang filters + map functions for >> a write-heavy app that I'm working on. >> >> Thanks, >> >> K >> --- >> http://www.pcapr.net >> http://twitter.com/pcapr >> http://labs.mudynamics.com >
