On 03/01/11 03:15, Filipe David Manana wrote:
You can also try the new replicator that landed recently into trunk
(from where 1.2 will be cut from), it adds more parallelism so you'll
likely see a better performance:
http://s.apache.org/KsY
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/commit/34eb4175f8547546cd76fbeb006421020cbf0d71
Version 1.2.0ac052866-git replicates my ginormous documents with
panache. My test-case-de-jeur is a document with 32,700 attachments, 4k
each. Inserting 100 attachments at a time, the document gets inserted
into the source database in 42 seconds. The destination database is
pulling the changes so fast I can't measure the latency by refreshing
futon: The moment I'm done adding the last attachment to the source
database, it appears in the destination database. Outstanding!
I had only one small issue building it: on Debian, the package
"erlang-eunit" is required to run "make check." Is that worth
mentioning in the DEVELOPER file?
Before I put it in production, "make check" reports some failures. Do
these matter?
Test Summary Report
-------------------
/var/lib/couchdb/custom-install-tree/couchdb/test/etap/160-vhosts.t
(Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 14 tests but ran 10.
/var/lib/couchdb/custom-install-tree/couchdb/test/etap/173-os-daemon-cfg-register.t
(Wstat: 0 Tests: 8 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 27 tests but ran 8.
Files=36, Tests=724, 52 wallclock secs ( 0.15 usr 0.04 sys + 11.29 cusr
1.16 csys = 12.64 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Oh, and: Can I try this out by just using this version on the
destination database, or does the source database also need need version?
