On Apr 12, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Travis Jensen <[email protected]> > wrote: >> If I wanted to encrypt all attachments, where would I go about hooking >> in to couch? I'm guessing I would have to replace the current >> attachment handler, right? >> >> I haven't started digging on this; I thought it might be useful to get >> some feedback first. >> >> Thanks >> >> Tj >> >> - >> Travis Jensen >> > > for better security I would encode them at the client level so the > server isn't aware of the decryption key or anything. > > - benoît While I totally agree with you, it isn't really practical for web-based applications. Tj - Travis Jensen
