supporting RFC 3284 format for PUT has been proposed before, and it's generic.
B. On 20 April 2011 21:55, sleepnova <[email protected]> wrote: > A sudo patch for demonstration. > > if(doc._rev=="07769cff70767095e4fb525dc9000b6e"){ > //Put your patch here > } > > I think above patch would be idempotent even when add or remove an array > element based on an index. > > 2011/4/21 sleepnova <[email protected]> > >> A patch which checks document version number might solve this problem. >> similar to a git commit log >> >> >> 2011/4/21 Aurélien Bénel <[email protected]> >> >>> Dear Paul, >>> >>> > On the other hand, there's nothing inherently wrong with the PATCH verb >>> >>> True, PATCH could be idempotent... It just depends on your patch format. >>> >>> I just had a look at your patch operations specification: >>> - When you add or remove a key/value, this is idempotent. >>> - However, when you add or remove an array element based on an index, this >>> is not. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Aurélien >> >> >> -- >> - sleepnova >> > > -- > - sleepnova >
