On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Randall Leeds <[email protected]>wrote:
> If you can think of any more details that are relevant, please post them. > Probably the most relevant detail is that we threw two more servers behind the load balancer and I didn't know they were active. :-) So that explains the behavior. Sorry I didn't follow up to my original note. Appreciate the reply! -- Matthew Woodward [email protected] http://blog.mattwoodward.com identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
