Heya,
On 09/06/11 16:07, Marcello Nuccio wrote:
2011/6/9 Torstein Krause Johansen<[email protected]>:
On 08/06/11 19:21, Sean Copenhaver wrote:
For stale=update_after/ok, does that mean the next query could block until
the view updated? Even if the it was also a stale=update_after/ok query?
I've tested this with two eternal wget loops, one running with stale=ok and
one the default non stale data setting.
I think a more interesting test is with two loops, one running with
stale=ok and one running with stale=update_after.
Could be, but I'm still on 0.11.0-2.3 :-)
I expect stale=update_after to behave the same as stale=ok but also
trigger view index update.
Is this true?
Don't know, but that's what I'd expect too.
Cheers,
-Torstein