I know for a fact it is the design name.  That is not arguable.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:52 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm... I tried that, but it didn't work.
> I also thought that indicating the database name was redundant in this case,
> because as you said, it was already specified in $db.
> However the few examples I saw so far use the database name + the view name.
>
> The error message I get, again, is:
> "An error ocurred accessing the view: missing"
>
>
>
> On , Mark Hahn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > $db.view('database/myview')
>
>
>
>> That is wrong. It should be $db.view('design/myview').
>
>
>
>> The db is already specified in $db.
>
>
>

Reply via email to