It was said, or at least implied, in another thread. Please don't remove it from the wiki.
It's clear that the wiki serves poorly as an official source of documentation. This is not surprising given that's not where their strengths lie. There's an effort to create solid documentation that will form part of future releases. They will live under source control with the code base where we can make it part of our routine to ensure their accuracy over time. If this effort is successful, everyone will benefit from a definitive source of API documentation, the wiki can revert to being entirely supplemental and non-definitive. B. On 13 July 2011 17:48, Jens Alfke <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 13, 2011, at 1:03 AM, Robert Newson wrote: > >> We changed the format between releases. As noted, this is not part of the >> public API. > > Actually no one had said in this thread that open_revs isn't public API. :/ > Shall I remove the references to it from the wiki (both with ‘all’ and with a > revision list?) > > Going forward it might be useful to adopt a special naming convention for new > parameters that are for internal use only, like an “i_” prefix. > > —Jens
