Kinda sorta. Except for how they're different. On Aug 19, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
> Cross-post to user@, why CouchDB is like Git. > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13087489#comment-13087489 >> ] >> >> Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-1252: >> -------------------------------------------- >> >> @Jason, >> >> A couple weeks ago I would have agreed completely with you. So much in fact >> that when someone reported a bug that _bulk_docs was storing the body of >> docs submitted with _deleted: true set, it was immediately assumed to be a >> bug and was promptly fixed. >> >> Until Damien said "That was on purpose so people can say why something was >> deleted." >> >> In reality, the only "special" sauce for deleted docs is that they're not >> considered conflicts. Other than that, you can still create a doc based on >> the revision of a deleted doc. In fact you can rescue an edit history from >> any known revision. But I digress. > > Oh, so you are saying revisions are like Git? > > Cool. That makes it easy to understand. > > -- > Iris Couch
