That's very useful to know - thanks. We'll give that some further thought. Is there some documentation we've missed on the pros/cons/pitfalls of multi-master replication?
Rob ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark J. Reed" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, 22 August, 2011 12:20:09 PM > Subject: Re: Multi node topology > Load balancing is not sufficient for all uses, in particular if you > use the > changes APi. Different nodes have different sequence numbers, so if > you > subscribe to the changes feed, lose the connection, and get a > different node > on reconnect, you will lose track of your place, and either miss > changes or > reprocess some. > > On Monday, August 22, 2011, Robert Elliot <[email protected]> wrote: > > No probs - we've got load balancers already available that we're > > familiar > with scripting and administering, so if the cluster is not partitioned > treating it as a single node is as easy for us just using our load > balancers. > > > > Rob > > > > -- > Mark J. Reed <[email protected]>
