+1 to getting some more informed discussion on this point. CouchDB works very well for the applications I am using it for, but I would love to see an informed critique of how and why CouchDB was unable to scale for Ubuntu.
Regards, James Marca On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:48:06AM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder that there's so few to no reaction about ubuntu one dropping CouchDB > and as a consequence also desktopcouch. I'm really sad about this, since I > really liked the idea of having my PIM data in CouchDB rather then in SQL > (default Akonadi store). > > How do you think about this? Even if the ubuntu people were not able to scale > CouchDB, that doesn't seem to be a reason for me to also drop CouchDB on the > client. Is desktopcouch a sane concept that could be continued even without > Cloudera? > > Maybe they just didn't want to have Erlang on the client?[1] > > [1] http://blog.novacut.com/2011/11/note-on-ubuntu-one-dropping-couchdb.html > > Regards, > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro > > > > Bookmarks: > > * Desktopcouch alternative: https://launchpad.net/dc3 > * Email archive with CouchDB? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8276110/how- > to-implement-an-imap-server-on-top-of-a-couchdb-nosql-data-store
pgpKPbOcvHeUA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
