SimpleDB had too many indexes and dynamoDB has too few. Maybe their third one will get it just right (to quote Goldilocks).
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]>wrote: > I skimmed the docs. It looks more like a SimpleDB with more scaling > than it does a CouchDB replacement. Definitely going to spend more > time reading later to see if there are any decent ideas to borrow. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Mark Hahn <[email protected]> wrote: > > I assume most of you have seen the Amazon announcement for the new > > hosted DynamoDB service. > > > > http://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2012/01/amazon-dynamodb.html > > > > I was kind of excited about it since it's a nosql db that looked similar > to > > couch at fiirst. After studying the api I was surprised to see that you > > could only index on one field. Has anyone else considered using it? > What > > use-case is it good for? >
