I could see it as a bad idea in that views usually have a different collation from the changes feed. Views also can emit more than 1 key/value per doc, which I'm not sure how that works with filters. I suppose it's possible, but you'd still have to follow the changes sequence, but when applying the map function, you replicate only the id emitted once.
- Jim Sent from my iPad On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29 January 2012 18:13, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Gonzalez <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> - Am I doing something wrong in the curl calls? >>> - Is it at all possible to use views together with filters, or are >>> filters limited to the _changes feed? I have seen no examples of >>> filters except related to _changes >>> >> >> >> filters are only expected for _changes. >> >> - benoît > > Although it might be interesting to factor out filters (in changes and > replication) and to manage them the same way as views, including being > able to use views as replication targets, and avoid needing to > reprocess the filter each time. > > I'm sure that when I think about this after my wine, I'll come up with > some good reasons why thats not a great idea. > > A+ > Dave
