I thought not, scanning the _changes feed is pretty terrifying! On 28 March 2012 07:10, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Obviously, that's without the alternatively horror of scanning > _changes for the doc id. :D > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Come to think of it, no I don't think you can. > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Luke Driscoll <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> is there any way that I can access a document's local_seq without > creating > >> a view for it? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Luke >
