For the record, the vast majority of my responses were "I don't know A or B or Both". I think that's expected, since there are a number of internal refactoring items, and end users won't typically have an opinion.
Eli On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark, > > The "I can't decide" option allows you to tell us that you "don't > understand either option" which is valuable input in its own right. > > B. > > On 14 April 2012 02:20, Mark Hahn <[email protected]> wrote: >> I went through them for a while and gave up because there were many >> internal ones I didn't understand. Then I looked at results and saw a >> number of ideas I would really like to vote for. >> >> In other words this site's methodology didn't work for me. >> >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks to everyone who participated in the CouchDB summit in Boston this >>> week! In case you didn't know, the (25 pages!) of meeting minutes are >>> available for review at http://s.apache.org/ndI . >>> >>> Here's where we need YOUR HELP. During the summit, the participants >>> identified 38 key features we think are important for CouchDB's future. >>> Please help us RANK these ideas by visiting our All Our Ideas page: >>> >>> http://www.allourideas.org/couchdb2012/ >>> >>> All Our Ideas is a free/open source solution for voting based on >>> pairwise comparison - think Kittenwar - and is super easy to use. >>> >>> Please complete as many comparisons as you can; we'd like all the >>> feedback we can get. We'd be thrilled if each of you did at least 100 >>> comparisons. >>> >>> Thanks again for your help in determining the future of Apache CouchDB! >>> >>> -- >>> Joan Touzet | [email protected] | wohali everywhere else >>>
