Hi, Turns out I'm just being a spanner and the reason nothing was changing was due to my first field being a date, so there was no opportunity for the second sort field to affect the results. Testing this with other fields works like a charm. Sorry for wasting your time!
Rory On Friday, 4 May 2012 at 12:05, Robert Newson wrote: > Hi Rory, > > Yes, it should be possible and you appear to be using correct syntax > (assuming your sort parameter is actually reaching the couchdb-lucene > server). What results are you getting? What version of couchdb-lucene > are you using? If you try the query again and add &debug=true, you > should get some more info. Feel free to include that in this thread. > > B. > > On 4 May 2012 11:59, Rory Franklin <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need to be able to sort on two fields on a CouchDB Lucene index, but the > > requirement is to be able to sort ascending for one field and descending > > for the other. Is this possible? I'm using the following syntax but it > > doesn't appear to make a difference when I change the second sort direction: > > > > sort=\created_at,/company_name > > > > Is this possible? > > > > -- > > > > Rory
