The alarms can be ignored, they're a side-effect of a new feature in couchdb that monitors disk consumption.
The test suite failures below look like the usual ones caused by browser cache issues. Clear your cache and try again. B. On 11 Jun 2012, at 11:39, [email protected] wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm newbie to couchdb > I have just installed it on my PC which is running Windows 7 > I'm using a Dell Vostro with Intel(R) core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.1 GHz and > 2.0GB memory > I'm getting errors on the erlang console with frequent "alarm_handler: > {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}} " > When I run the verify test it passes. > When I run the test suite though it fails as shown below: > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > Name > Status > Elapsed Time > Details > > > > basics > success > 4849ms > > > > all_docs > success > 172ms > > > > attachments > error > 218ms > > Run with debugger > Assertion failed: xhr.responseText == lorem > Exception raised: {} > > > > attachments_multipart > success > 101ms > > > > attachment_names > success > 30ms > > > > attachment_paths > success > 121ms > > > > attachment_ranges > success > 44ms > > > > attachment_views > success > 146ms > > > > auth_cache > success > 254ms > > > > batch_save > success > 594ms > > > > bulk_docs > success > 352ms > > > > changes > success > 2063ms > > > > coffee > success > 200ms > > > > compact > success > 2403ms > > > > config > success > 88ms > > > > conflicts > success > 132ms > > > > content_negotiation > success > 21ms > > > > cookie_auth > success > 192ms > > > > copy_doc > success > 42ms > > > > delayed_commits > success > 17571ms > > > > design_docs > success > 27616ms > > > > design_options > success > 97ms > > > > design_paths > success > 78ms > > > > erlang_views > success > 719ms > > > > etags_head > success > 52ms > > > > etags_views > success > 5252ms > > > > form_submit > success > 19ms > > > > http > success > 38ms > > > > invalid_docids > success > 68ms > > > > jsonp > success > 51ms > > > > large_docs > success > 53ms > > > > list_views > failure > 401ms > > Run with debugger > Assertion 'xhr.status == 200, "standard get should be 200"' failed: standard > get should be 200 > Assertion failed: /head0123456789tail/.test(xhr.responseText) > > > > lots_of_docs > success > 187ms > > > > method_override > success > 37ms > > > > multiple_rows > success > 42ms > > > > oauth > success > 1324ms > > > > oauth_users_db > success > 116ms > > > > proxyauth > success > 73ms > > > > purge > success > 207ms > > > > reader_acl > success > 2421ms > > > > recreate_doc > success > 177ms > > > > reduce > success > 1655ms > > > > reduce_builtin > success > 2397ms > > > > reduce_false > success > 65ms > > > > reduce_false_temp > success > 34ms > > > > replication > success > 94105ms > > > > replicator_db > failure > 67550ms > > Run with debugger > Assertion failed: copy === null > Assertion failed: expected 'null', got > '{"_id":"foo666","_rev":"1-8f008c4354eb07d5fbfc399a84bc88a1","value":666}' > > > > replicator_db_security > success > 382ms > > > > rev_stemming > failure > 259ms > > Run with debugger > Assertion failed: db.open("bar", {revs: true})._revisions.ids.length == > newLimit + 1 > Assertion failed: db.open("bar", {revs: true})._revisions.ids.length == > newLimit + 1 > > > > rewrite > success > 173ms > > > > security_validation > success > 786ms > > > > show_documents > success > 285ms > > > > stats > success > 6656ms > > > > update_documents > success > 335ms > > > > users_db > success > 110ms > > > > users_db_security > success > 277ms > > > > utf8 > success > 67ms > > > > uuids > success > 153ms > > > > view_collation > success > 171ms > > > > view_collation_raw > success > 192ms > > > > view_conflicts > success > 108ms > > > > view_compaction > failure > 1005ms > > Run with debugger > Assertion failed: resp.view_index.disk_size < disk_size_before_compact > > > > view_errors > success > 880ms > > > > view_include_docs > success > 219ms > > > > view_multi_key_all_docs > success > 65ms > > > > view_multi_key_design > success > 163ms > > > > view_multi_key_temp > success > 81ms > > > > view_offsets > success > 614ms > > > > view_pagination > success > 149ms > > > > view_sandboxing > success > 125ms > > > > view_update_seq > success > 5190ms > > > > view_xml > success > 45ms > > > > Does anyone know how to get over this problem? > >
