Hm, the doc object should be sealed, though. You won't be able to modify it reliably (it'll depend on whether you link against a spidermonkey that supports object sealing, which is most, but not all, of them).
B. On 12 June 2012 07:44, bryan rasmussen <[email protected]> wrote: > hey yeah, that should work fine, I just set it to 'private' when I > emit. Damn, I should have thought of that, down in the code too long > is making me tunnel visioned :) > > > thanks, > Bryan Rasmussen > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Zera Holladay <[email protected]> wrote: >> Try deleting the username field in the view and then emitting the doc? >> I don't know why it would work, but I don't know why it wouldn't >> either. Just an idea. >> >> -zh >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> why not use a show or list function that removes that field? >>> >>> B. >>> >>> On 12 June 2012 01:37, Jens Alfke <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:29 PM, bryan rasmussen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does couchdb have some sort of higher level way of doing this that >>>>> will have better performance than just looping through the object and >>>>> copying over every property unless it is the username one? >>>> >>>> Is the performance of that a problem? Remember, the map function is only >>>> run when a document is updated. It's generating an index, not performing >>>> the query. >>>> >>>> —Jens
