Both forms are valid Unicode (in UTF-8 encoding). The character in question can be represented directly or as a unicode escape sequence. Both answers are correct and equivalent.
B. On 3 Jul 2012, at 16:16, Marten Feldtmann wrote: > From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt: > > " > ... > JSON text SHALL be encoded in Unicode. The default encoding is > UTF-8. > ... > " > > The JSON parser (used) should therefore deliver the same object structure ... > regardless of the escaped-format-writing or not. > > Marten > > > Am 03.07.2012 15:57, schrieb [email protected]: >> I'm not quite sure (in the sense that I don't understand) >> about the word equivalent; >> but thank you very much so far!
