I suppose there is a difference between the percieved activeness through company and non-company driven marketing for MongoDB and CouchDB.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:48 PM, CGS <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gustavo, > > I suppose it is referred to the bit of delay in releasing version 1.2.0, > but otherwise you get here quite an active community. > > Have fun and relax! ;) > > CGS > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Gustavo Machado <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > I was driven to couchdb lately and so far it looks like pure awesome. I > > remember back in the days when we were choosing a document database, that > > we chose MongoDB against CouchDB because of the project stability and > > roadmap. At the time, several people said that CouchDB was not being very > > active. I went to the repo and looks like pretty active to me, so I > wonder > > why people would say that at the time. > > > > Does anybody find any of this reasonable? (Maybe they meant in comparison > > to Mongo?) > > > > Anyways, I have already decided to use couch in my next pet project :) > > > > Thanks, > > Gustavo > > >
