On Sep 25, 2012 8:32 PM, "Mark Hahn" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The _changes feed only ever shows leaf revisions > > AARRGGHH. I am so screwed. I have been working on a scheme that relies on > tracking every change. To do what?
And as everyone knows there is normally no way to > find out what changed in a doc. I am going to have to add a history of > changes to each doc which it not only wasteful, but a pain to implement. Why not storing a change as a new doc? > > Thanks for taking the trouble to give me bad news. > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected] >wrote: > > > On Sep 24, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Mark Hahn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If I update a particular doc multiple times rapidly, is each update > > > guaranteed to show up in a continuous changes feed? I am worried that > > the > > > change feed will be optimized to just show the latest value of a doc with > > > multiple updates. This would break my logic. > > > > Your worries are justified. The _changes feed only ever shows leaf > > revisions (i.e., latest updates to branches of the edit tree). Regards, > > > > Adam
