On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Robin Berjon <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25/10/2012 19:50 , Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> >> Well first version of the rewriter was based on a function [1]. After >> long discussions it wasn't accepted for performances reasons. I'm not >> sure we should accept it for now until we change the js evaluation. > > > Performance reasons would be problematic if it were the only option. But > since this is just one option, I reckon it should be okay. Also note that > I'd be happy to add caching at some point; I've been wondering if it should > vary with userCtx or not (I'm leaning towards not but unsure). > I don't think it's good to have multiple options to handle rewrite. Also most of the time you want a function is because you aren't doing a fully restful rewriter. I think the proposal in couchapp-ng gives you a lot of flexibility by using regexp. At the end this is what do most of the frameworks. And somehow is like mongrel2 at this point.
- benoit
