What is it you are trying to do, and why'd you need to cat them? Can you just get all rows for a given key and skip the reduce completely?
On Thursday, 6 December 2012 at 21:48, Will Heger wrote: > Ok, I understand the theory/guideline/commandment is that reductions > should really only be scalars and structures that grow can have all > kinds of terrible effects on performance, cause cancer, etc., but I > don't know how hard this rule is. Here is my use case: > > I'm reducing mapped data of no more than around a dozen or so docs per > reduction. The dozen docs are transactions and will contain > transaction IDs that are not longer than a GUID. Can I get away with > concatting a list of that size within my reduction without dooming us > all? > > Thanks in advance for any guidance. > -Will > >
