No, but it will break Lucene.... Badly... To the point that cleaning up
doesn't help. Although, we're still on Lucene 3.5.x. Hopefully, this
problem doesnt exist on 3.6.x.


On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]>wrote:

> Well, Lucene probably can't handle it, but Lucene doesn't break the .couch
> file to be sure.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Andrey Kuprianov <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Has problems with Lucene, if you are using it. Do replication, if you
> can.
> > Safer this way.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Should be fine.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Michael Parker
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > If I have a database that is performing create/update/delete
> operations
> > > on
> > > > documents, and I use cp to copy its .couch file on an ext3
> filesystem,
> > > will
> > > > my copy be corrupted or have any inconsistencies? Looking at how the
> > > .couch
> > > > file is always increasing in size, and given the whole revision
> system
> > > > employed by CouchDB, I'm thinking that it employs some append-only
> > > logging
> > > > -- so maybe yes?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to