The page is certainly poorly written (and poorly arranged), it could use a thorough tidy up.
When I restored it I clarified that it was to see your session, rather than make one. B. On 8 January 2013 02:36, Jens Alfke <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> and I've restored them, they document an important feature. > > No, I left the part about using GET to return information about the login > session, which is the feature you described. > > The bit I deleted was the part at the top that claimed that GET would create > a login session (i.e. set a cookie), because it’s not true. > > —Jens
